The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL A. FETTERMAN GLENN J. HINTON
ROBERT W. MARTELL and DAVID B. PAPWORTH
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0498
Application 08/532,225
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-10, 12, 13 and 29-
36, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application. An amendment after final rejection was filed on
June 16, 1997 and was entered by the examiner.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007