Ex parte HAKEY et al. - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not    
                written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.    
                                                                 Paper No. 16         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     

                               Ex parte MARK C. HAKEY,                                
                                  STEVEN J. HOLMES,                                   
                                   DAVID V. HORAK,                                    
                                  and WILLIAM H. MA                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0768                                 
                              Application No. 08/878,136                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: November 07, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before, WARREN, KRATZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 14, 15 and 17-19, which are all of the                  
          claims pending in this application.                                         
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to a high capacitance                    
          storage node substrate.  An understanding of the invention can              







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007