Ex parte GARRIGUS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0810                                                        
          Application No. 08/463,883                                                  
          perovskite ceramic, the sol being susceptible to heating by                 
          absorbing microwave energy, and exposing the coated substrate               
          to microwave radiation to sinter the sol to a perovskite                    
          ceramic by heating.  Further details of this appealed subject               
          matter are set forth in the appealed claim which reads as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               23. A sintering process for preparing a perovskite                     
          ceramic, comprising the steps of:                                           
               (a) coating a substrate with a sol containing precursors               
          of the perovskite ceramic, the sol being susceptible to                     
          heating by absorbing microwave radiation;                                   
               (b) exposing the coated substrate to microwave radiation               
          for pulses of selected duration to sinter the sol to a                      
          perovskite ceramic by heating the coated substrate to a                     
          temperature above 800 F.B                                                      
               No references have been relied upon by the examiner in                 
          the rejection before us on this appeal.                                     
               Claim 23 stands rejected under the first paragraph of 35               
          U.S.C. § 112.  It is the examiner’s basic position that claim               
          23 does not comply with either the written description                      
          requirement or the enablement requirement of this paragraph                 
          because the claim is directed to a perovskite ceramic                       
          generically rather than to a LaMnO -family perovskite ceramic               
                                            3                                         
          specifically.  According to the examiner, “[t]he                            
          specification, as originally filed, does not provide an                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007