Ex Parte TOMITA et al - Page 7





             Appeal No. 1999-0874                                                                                  
             Application 08/726,733                                                                                



                    Treating independent claim 7 first, the claimed first conductive layer comprises               
             gate electrode 4.  The conductive region claimed corresponds to the diffused drain                    
             regions 6, 8.  The first insulation layer comprises silicon oxide layer 9 on top of which is          
             silicon nitride layer 10.  The diameter of the first hole comprises the width extending               
             between the diffused regions 6 just above the diffused region 8.                                      
                    The claimed second insulation layer comprises silicon oxide layer 11.  At this                 
             level of the vertically integrated structure of Figures 38 and 39, it is seen that the hole           
             110 has a larger diameter as claimed than the one just described with respect to the                  
             surface diffused regions 6, 8 corresponding to the first hole, thus meeting also the                  
             recitation of claim 7 that the second hole be larger than the first hole.                             
                    The use of sidewall oxides in vertical integration techniques for integrated circuits          
             is detailed in Teng to aid in patterning contact holes, which techniques are directly                 
             applicable to the hole diameters and the function of the chip surface contact to the                  
             claimed second conductive layers of polysilicon 17 and tungsten silicide 18 in prior art              
             Figures 38 and 39.  The problems associated with the formation of the prior art                       
             structures between Figures 38 and 39 of the appellants’ admitted prior art involve the                
             desirability of placing circuit elements such as the gate electrodes 4 in Figure 36 closer            
             together in Figure 37 compared to Figure 36, thus increasing the integrated circuit                   
             density of active circuit elements.  This same consideration drives the disclosure in                 
             Teng from the initial paragraphs at column 1 of this reference.                                       

                                                        7                                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007