Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte IKEDA et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte IKEDA et al. - Page 1

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                      
            today was not written for publication and is not binding                  
            precedent of the Board                                                    
                                                          Paper No. 21                

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte KENSUKE IKEDA                                 
                                   And MAKOTO ONO                                     
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-1004                                  
                               Application 08/764,397                                 
                                     __________                                       
                              HEARD: DECEMBER 11, 2001                                
                                     __________                                       
            Before OWENS, PAWLIKOWSKI and POTEATE, Administrative                     
            Patent Judges.                                                            
            PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                 
            1-3 and 5-13.  Claims 4 and 14 have been canceled.  Claim                 
            1 is reproduced below:                                                    
                 1.  A photoimaging material comprising a support                     
            having thereon a photoimaging layer comprising                            
            microcapsules and a reducing agent present outside the                    
            microcapsules,                                                            
                 wherein the microcapsules contain a leuco dye                        
            capable of oxidative color formation, a photooxidizing                    
            agent and an organosulfur antioxidant, and                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007