Ex Parte JUNE - Page 18




              Appeal No. 1999-1245                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/245,282                                                                               


              intracellularly to modulate production of D-3 phosphoinositides in the T cell, e.g., such                
              as through inhibition of PI3K.                                                                           
                     The rejection of the claims for obviousness of the claimed invention is reversed.                 


              Other Issues                                                                                             
                     Upon return of the application to the examiner, the Merits Panel recommends                       
              that the examiner consider the relevance of the attached patents and/or publication,                     
              Bonjouklian 1 and 2, Weisinger, and Creemer, to the pending claims.   In interpreting                    
              claim 1, it would appear that the claim requires a single step of contacting a T cell with               
              an agent which acts intracellularly to modulate production of D-3 phosphoinositides in                   
              the T cell, such as wortmannin or quercetin.                                                             
                     Creemer, claim 17, describes a method of inhibiting PI-3 kinase in mammals                        
              comprising administering to a mammal an effective amount of a wortmannin derivative.                     
              Boujouklian 1 and 2 also describe a method of inhibiting PI-3 kinase in a mammal in                      
              need of treatment by administering wortmannin or analogs thereof.   Weisinger                            
              describes that administration of wortmannin to rats inhibits an inflammatory response.                   
                     It is a general rule that merely discovering and claiming a new benefit of an old                 
              process cannot render the process again patentable.  In re Woodruff,   919 F.2d 1575,                    
              1577-78, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936-37 (Fed. Cir. (1990); Bird Provision Co. v. Owens                          
              Country Sausage, Inc. 568 F.2d 369, 375, 197 USPQ 134, 139 (5th Cir. 1978); In re                        

                                                          18                                                           





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007