Ex parte YANG et al. - Page 1





                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for               
                             publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                                 Paper No. 17                  

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                                 __________                                                    
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 __________                                                    
                           Ex parte YAN-PING YANG, ALI KANDIL, LUCY GISONNI,                                   
                                 RAAFAT E.F. FAHIM, and MICHEL H. KLEIN                                        
                                                 __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 1999-1271                                               
                                          Application No. 08/467,883                                           
                                                 __________                                                    
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                 __________                                                    
                Before ROBINSON, SCHEINER, and GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judges.                          
                GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                   
                final rejection of claims 29-46, all of the claims remaining in the application.               
                Claim 29 is representative and reads as follows:                                               
                      29.    A process for individually isolating P1, P2 and P6 outer membrane                 
                protein from a Haemophilus strain, comprising the steps of:                                    
                      (a)    providing a cell paste of the Haemophilus strain;                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007