Ex parte KIRCHMEYER et al. - Page 1




        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not          
        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                              Paper No. 21          

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                            Ex parte STEPHAN KIRCHMEYER,                            
                                HANNS-PETER MÜLLER,                                 
                                  MARTIN ULLRICH,                                   
                                        and                                         
                                ULRICH LIESENFELDER                                 
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-1390                                
                             Application No. 08/655,783                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                       
                                    ___________                                     
         Before OWENS, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative               
         Patent Judges.                                                             
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
         the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 4, which are            
         all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.             
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for the             
         production of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer.  Further               








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007