Ex parte OGURA - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-1520                                                                                             
              Application No. 08/634,203                                                                                       

                                                      BACKGROUND                                                               
                      The invention relates to motion vector detecting in an MPEG (Motion Picture                              
              Experts Group) system.   Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                            
                      1.     An adaptive motion vector detecting apparatus for adaptively selecting                            
                      pixels employed to detect motion vectors between a first video frame and a second                        
                      video frame, said first video frame including a reference block of pixels comprised                      
                      of all of the pixels in an M x N block of said first video frame and said second video                   
                      frame including a check block of pixels, comprising:                                                     
                             analyzing means for adaptively determining positions of a first subset of                         
                      pixels in said reference block from a variable feature of said reference block; and                      
                             selecting means for sampling said first subset of pixels in said reference                        
                      block and a second subset of pixels in said check block at said positions                                
                      determined by said analyzing means.                                                                      
                      The examiner relies on the following references:                                                         
              Yamada et al.  (Yamada)                      5,475,446                     Dec. 12, 1995                         
              Kondo                                        5,612,751                     Mar. 18, 1997                         
                                                                                  (filed Jan. 30, 1995)                        
                      Claims 1-3, 8, 19-21, and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                               
              anticipated by Yamada.                                                                                           
                      Claims 4-7, 9-18, 22-25, and 27-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                         
              unpatentable over Yamada and Kondo.                                                                              
                      We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 8) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                           
              No. 14) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 13) and the                       




                                                              -2-                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007