Ex parte SARALLO et al. - Page 1





                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for              
                                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                                                           Paper No. 25                 


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                        
                            Ex parte JOHN C. SARALLO and WILLIAM A. FELDERMAN                                           
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 1999-1802                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/806,466                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                    ____________                                                        
              Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4,                    
              6-10 and 17.  Claims 11-13 and 16 have been indicated by the examiner as allowable                        
              over the prior art of record, and claims 14 and 15 have been objected to by the examiner.                 


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                        









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007