THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAI-HER YANG
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1927
Application 08/499,367
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claim 3, which constitutes the only claim remaining in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a motor casing which provides an axial flux path
between two magnetic poles of the motor, and which is in the form of two C-shaped end
casings between which are clamped the magnetic poles.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007