Appeal No. 1999-2010
Application No. 08/684,635
do not sustain the obviousness of independent claims 21, 27
and 35 over Smith and Southland. The dependent claims 2 to
10, 15 to 18, 20, 22 to 26, 28 to 31 and 33 also fall with the
respective independent claims.
In conclusion, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1 to 10, 15 to 18, 20 to 31, 33 and 35 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over Smith in view of Southland is reversed.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007