Ex parte SPENCER - Page 7
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte SPENCER - Page 7
Appeal No. 1999-2182 Page 7
Application No. 08/710,704
16 also is not sustained. In addition, with regard to claim 14, the examiner has provided
no evidence in support of his conclusion that the fins recited in claim 14 would have been
an obvious matter of design choice.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejection is not sustained, and the decision of the examiner is
REVERSED.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
