Ex parte PAYNE et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 24              
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                    Ex parte  ALEXANDER P. PAYNE, WILLIAM C. CAIN,                    
                       MICHAEL E. DEVILLIER, HAROLD J. HAMILTON,                      
                         ROBERT D. HEMPSTEAD, DARREN T. IMAI,                         
                         MARK A. LAUER, DIMITRE A. LATEV, and                         
                                   DAVID D. ROBERTS                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2235                                 
                              Application No. 08/577,493                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before LALL, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 8, 10, and 14 through 20, which               
          are all of the claims pending in this application.                          
               Appellants' invention relates to an information storage                
          system.  Specifically, the system includes a rigid disk having              
          a media layer and a transducer having a core of magnetically                
          permeable material shaped as a loop with a submicron amagnetic              
          gap between the two ends of the loop.  A magnetic signal from               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007