Appeal No. 1999-2257 Page 4
Application No. 08/767,220
Cassorla et al. (“Cassorla”) 5,146,552 Sep.
8, 1992
(filed Feb. 28, 1990)
Cochran et al. (“Cochran”) 4,879,648 Nov. 7,
1989
Claims 25, 28-33, and 36-40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being obvious over Cassorla in view of Cochran.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of the appellant or
examiner in toto, we
refer the reader to the brief and answer for the respective
details thereof.
OPINION
After considering the record, we are persuaded that the
examiner erred in rejecting claims 25, 28-33, and 36-40.
Accordingly, we reverse. We begin by summarizing the
examiner's rejection and the appellant's argument.
The examiner asserts, "a state or airport code may be
entered into the location field. Depending on the code
entered, the processing for a state or airport is performed."
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007