Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte ZDEPSKI et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte ZDEPSKI et al. - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte JOEL ZDEPSKI, RAMA KALLURI, HOWARD PAGE                    
                               and WOLF-HASSO KAUBISCH                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2306                                  
                               Application 08/639,284                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-28, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.  An amendment after final                
          rejection was filed on December 7, 1998, and was entered by                 
          the examiner.                                                               

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007