The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHUAN QIN, PARTRICK T. RYAN, DONNA L.
ROSTRON, BIRENDRA K. LAL, YUANPANG S. DING, SUSAN
R. MIZENER, LECOND WOO and MICHAEL T. K.
LING
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2329
Application 08/642,278
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
10, all the claims in the application.1
1An amendment after final rejection seeking to add claims
11 to 30 was denied entry by the examiner (Advisory Action,
Apr. 10, 1998 (Paper No. 15)).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007