Ex parte CHOUINARD - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-2425                                                        
          Application 08/659,380                                                      


          follows: claims 1-3, 9 and 11 over Wentz in view of Reinhard                
          and Gordon; claims 4-8 over Wentz in view of Reinhard, Gordon               
          and Ashbridge; and claim 10 over Wentz in view of Reinhard,                 
          Gordon and Novak.                                                           





                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              
               The appellant’s claims require that the kneeler device                 
          has a flat bottom.  Wentz discloses a carpet seam-making                    
          kneeler device having a bottom surface which preferably is                  
          slightly convex across its width and has air vent holes                     
          (abstract).  The convex surface inclines at an angle of about               
          15E to valleys (25 and 26) on both sides of the convex surface              
          (col. 3, lines 26-28; figure 1).  The convex surface functions              
          to impart an upwardly concave curvature to a cooling hot glue               
          tape below the carpet seam thereby producing a concave set in               
          the tape such that subsequent stretching of the carpet causes               
          the joint at the seam to be pulled level with the carpet                    


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007