Appeal No. 1999-2450 Page 16
Application No. 08/812,222
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-4 under § 103(a) as
being obvious over Tanamachi and the rejection of claims 2 and
4 as being obvious over Buzak in view of Kitajima are
reversed. The rejection of claims 1 and 3 under § 103(a) as
being obvious over Buzak in view of Kitajima, however, is
reversed. The affirmance is based only on the arguments made
in the briefs. Arguments not made therein are neither before
us nor at issue but are considered waived.
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007