a composition according to claim 2 of Shiokawa or claim 28 of Maienfisch,
or
a method according to claim 3 of Shiokawa or claim 29 of Maienfisch.
20. The claims of the parties are as follows:
(i) The claims of the parties are:
Shiokawa ‘146 : 1-3
Maienfisch ‘664: 24-25 and 28-29
(ii) The claims of the parties which corresponded to Count 2 are:
Shiokawa ‘146 : 1-3
Maienfisch ‘664: 24-25 and 28-29
(iii) The claims of the parties which did not correspond to Count 2 are:
Shiokawa ‘146 : None
Maienfisch ‘664: None
(Paper No. 1, p. 47, Paper No. 50, and Paper No. 63).
21. The accorded priority benefit is the same for Count 2 as it was for Count 1. (See Paper No. 1,
p. 46).
II. Opinion
15
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007