SANDHU et al. v. COTE et al. - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 64                   
          Filed by: Murriel E. Crawford                                               
               Box Interference                                                       
          Washington, D.C. 20231                                                      
          Tel: 703-308-9787                                                           
          Fax: 703-308-7953                                                           
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                       GURTEJ S. SANDHU, LAURENCE D. SCHULTZ,                         
                                  and TRUNG T. DOAN                                   
                                    Junior Party,                                     
                                         v.                                           
                        WILLIAM J. COTE and MICHAEL A. LEACH                          
                                    Senior Party.                                     
                                    ____________                                      
                           Patent Interference No. 103,957                            
                                    ____________                                      
                                      JUDGMENT                                        
               In consideration of junior party Sandhu’s REQUEST FOR ENTRY            
          OF AN ADVERSE JUDGMENT, judgment as to the subject matter of the            
          count, is entered against party Sandhu, who is therefore not                
          entitled to a patent containing his claims 1-11.  As a result,              
          judgment as to the subject matter of the count is awarded to                
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007