HAYAMA et al v. KUMAR et al - Page 8




                35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, written description.  This recommendation is without prejudice                         
                to any other rejection the examiner deems necessary during the course of examining the Kumar                             
                ‘958 application.                                                                                                        


                C.      Order                                                                                                            
                        Upon consideration of the record, and for the reasons given, it is:                                              
                        ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference,                                  
                Paper No. 1, page 5), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against Junior Party Hayama.                        
                        FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Hayama is not entitled to a patent containing                                  
                claims 1-15 of Hayama et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,362,485.                                                                 
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Judgment shall be placed and given a paper                                   
                number in the file of Hayama et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,362,485 and Kumar et al., U.S. Patent                             
                Application 08/460,958.                                                                                                  

















                                                                  - 8 -                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007