The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RAYMOND R. HORTON,
CHANDRASEKHAR NARAYAN and
MICHAEL J. PALMER
__________
Appeal No. 1998-1813
Application 08/476,178
__________
RECONSIDERATION
__________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
In a paper filed January 3, 2001, appellants request that we reconsider our decision
dated November 8, 2000, wherein we sustained only the rejection of claims 6 through 10
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In that decision, we reversed the examiner's rejection of
independent claims 13 and 14 and their respective dependent claims
2 through 5 and 12. Appellants' request for rehearing sets forth three basic points.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007