Appeal No. 1999-1256
Application No. 08/333,076
We have carefully reviewed the original opinion in light of Appellants’ request, but
we find no point of law or fact which we overlooked or misapprehended in arriving at our
decision. To the extent it is relevant, Appellants’ request amounts to a reargument of
points already considered by the board. For the reasons discussed in the decision of
July 30, 2001, we decline to reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 31 and 32 on the
basis of nonenablement.
Appellants’ request has been granted to the extent that the decision has been
reconsidered, but such request is denied with respect to making any modifications to
the decision affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007