The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SEAN P. HANSON
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2774
Application 08/794,337
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
FRANKFORT and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellant’s request for rehearing
of our decision mailed September 28, 2000, wherein we affirmed
the examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 6, 10 through 13,
22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Kee in view of Law or Utterberg, and reversed the examiner’s
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007