Ex parte MAKSYMKIW et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1999-0852                                                                              
            Application No. 08/616,549                                                                        


                   If reconsideration by the examiner does not promptly result in the withdrawal of           
            all pending rejections, the examiner must return this application to the jurisdiction of          

            the board so that the appeal may be restored to its existing place in the order in which          

            appeals are decided.  A new appeal number will not be assigned nor will a new appeal              
            fee be required in the event that the examiner returns this application to the jurisdiction       

            of the board following reconsideration.                                                           

                   This application, by virtue of its “special” status, requires immediate action by          
            the examiner.  See MPEP § 708.01(d).  The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences               

            must be informed promptly of any action affecting the appeal in this case, including              
            reopening of prosecution, allowance and/or abandonment of the application.                        



                                                REMANDED                                                      



                                                                )                                             
                         BRUCE H. STONER, JR.                  )                                             
                         Chief Administrative Patent Judge      )                                             
                                                                )                                             
                                                                )                                             
                                                                ) BOARD OF PATENT                             
                         GARY V. HARKCOM                       )                                             
                         Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge )  APPEALS AND                                
                                                                )                                             
                                                                ) INTERFERENCES                               
                                                                )                                             
                         WILLIAM F. SMITH                      )                                             
                         Administrative Patent Judge            )                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007