Ex Parte WILLIAMS et al - Page 11



          Appeal No. 2000-0131                                                        
          Application No. 08/800,972                                                  

          61 USPQ2d 1430, 1433-34 (Fed. Cir. 2002).  Our review of Fuller             
          reveals no mention of parasitic current gain levels, let alone any          
          structural arrangement that would reduce parasitic current gain to          
          the specific level set forth in appealed claim 20.                          
               Similarly, with respect to independent claim 24, which sets            
          forth a specific threshold turn on voltage for the body bias                
          transistors of “less than 640 mv”, we find no evidence that would           
          support the Examiner’s assertion of obviousness.  We do initially           
          note, as discussed previously, that Appellants have not provided            
          any persuasive evidence that would convince us that the Examiner            
          has erred in concluding that the body bias transistors in Fuller,           
          in order to perform their function, would necessarily turn on               
          before the turn on of the intrinsic diodes of the MOSFET switch.            
          We find, however, no evidence provided by the Examiner that would           
          support the assertion that “ ... a standard diode is notoriously            
          well known to have a 640 mv diode drop”  (Answer, page 8) and,              
          accordingly, we find the Examiner’s conclusion that Fuller’s body           
          bias transistor turn on voltage would necessarily be less than 640          











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007