Ex parte KOPP - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-0154                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 08/942,954                                                  


          using a preheating saddle before each fixing device of each                 
          respective printer."  (Id.)  The appellant argues, "Sugaya                  
          teaches elimination of the second pre-heating saddle for dual               
          printing,                                                                   
          . . Naeser . . . shows a pre-heating [sic] saddle in the                    
          context of a single printer."  (Reply Br. at 2.)                            


               In deciding obviousness, “[a]nalysis begins with a key                 
          legal question -- what is the invention claimed?”  Panduit                  
          Corp. v. Dennison Mfg. Co., 810 F.2d 1561, 1567, 1 USPQ2d                   
          1593, 1597 (Fed. Cir. 1987).  Here, independent claim 21                    
          specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: "a heat              
          transfer fixing station for fixing a first toner image on a                 
          first side of a recording medium by direct heating thermal                  
          contact between the recording medium and at least one heating               
          roller; a heat transfer fixing station for fixing a second                  
          toner image on a second side of the recording medium facing                 
          opposite the first side by direct heating thermal contact                   
          between the recording medium and at least one heating roller;               
          a pre-heating saddle along a running direction of the                       








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007