Ex parte HASHIMOTO - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0196                                                        
          Application 08/796,478                                                      


               1.  An object levitating apparatus, comprising: means                  
          for vibrating uniformly in-phase and having upper and lower                 
          surfaces, and an ultrasonic excitation device that is attached              
          to the lower surface of the means for vibrating, said                       
          ultrasonic excitation device exciting the means for vibrating               
          such that the means for vibrating vibrates longitudinally,                  
          roughly  perpendicular to the upper surface, so that sound                  
          waves are generated and a radiated pressure is generated by                 
          said sound waves emitted from said means for vibrating for                  
          levitating an object without the use of a reflector above said              
          object.                                                                     
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Rey                           4,284,403                Aug. 18,             
          1981                                                                        
          Barmatz et al. (Barmatz ‘435) 4,549,435           Oct. 29,                  
          1985                                                                        
          Dorr                               4,735,096                Apr.            
          5, 1988                                                                     
          Murphy                        4,753,579                Jun. 28,             
          1988                                                                        




               (...continued)1                                                                     
          25) has been indicated on its face to be approved for entry. See Paper No. 26.
          However, it appears that this amendment has not been physically entered into
          the record.  For our purposes, we consider claim 1 as amended by this       
          amendment and we leave it to the examiner to make sure the entry of this    
          amendment in the record.  We note that there is another amendment after the 
          final rejection, amendment F, (Paper No. 23), which was filed on March 17,  
          1998. This amendment was not approved for entry.  See Paper No. 24.         
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007