Ex Parte DURHAM et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                                                                        Paper No. 14                   


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                           _____________                                               
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           _____________                                               
                     Ex parte CHRISTOPHER M. DURHAM and PETER J. KLIM                                  
                                           _____________                                               
                                      Appeal No. 2000-0354                                             
                                   Application No. 08/682,471                                          
                                           ______________                                              
                                              ON BRIEF                                                 
                                          _______________                                              

            Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                                
            Judges.                                                                                    
            THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s                            
            final rejection of claims 1 through 20.  Representative claim                              
            1 is reproduced below:                                                                     
                        1.  A circuit for monitoring energy dissipation in a                           
                  functional unit on an integrated circuit comprising:                                 
                        an energy sensing circuit fabricated on the integrated                         
                  circuit for measuring or estimating energy dissipation of                            
                  the functional unit; and                                                             








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007