The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STANLEY J. BROOKS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0368
Application No. 08/789,659
____________
HEARD: January 22, 2002
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 9, and
17-25. We note that claim 19 was rejected in the final rejection at page 3, but was not
addressed by the appellant in the brief. Furthermore, claim 19 has not been rejected or its
status addressed by the examiner in the answer. Neither has it been canceled by
appellant. Therefore, we do not address this claim in this decision.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007