Ex Parte CHANG et al - Page 1



          Appeal No. 2000-0421                                                        
          Application 08/912,429                                                      

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                      Ex parte CHI SHIH CHANG, WILLIAM T. CHEN,                       
                                  and AJIT TRIVEDI                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-0421                                  
                               Application 08/912,429                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
          the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 5-7, 9-11 and 13-15,                
          which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An           

                                          -1-                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007