Ex Parte BAUMANN et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0487                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/913,380                                                  

          three listed reactant components.  Appellants state that “claims            
          11-15 stand or fall together.”  Accordingly, we select claim 11             
          as the representative claim on which we shall decide this appeal.           
          Claim 11 is reproduced below.                                               
               11.  Water-soluble nonionic polyurethanes useful as                    
          protective colloids for the polymerization of olefinically                  
          unsaturated monomer in aqueous medium wherein said water-soluble            
          nonionic polyurethanes consist essentially of the reaction                  
          products of;                                                                
               a) organic polyisocyanates with                                        
               b) water-soluble polyalklene glycols containing at least 70%           
          by weight of ethylene glycol groups and with                                
               c) polyhydric branched alcohols containing at least three              
          hydroxyl groups per molecule, and wherein, the equivalent ratio             
          of b) to c) is in the range from 1:0.01 to 1:10 and the                     
          equivalent ratio of [b) + (c]to a) is in the range from 1:0.6 to            
          1:0.85.                                                                     
               The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the              
          examiner is:                                                                
          Georgoudis et al. (Georgoudis)     3,660,010      May 02, 1972              
               Claims 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                   
          anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          being unpatentable over Georgoudis.                                         
               We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer for            
          a complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by               
          appellants and the examiner concerning the issues before us on              
          this appeal.                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007