Ex Parte JARVEST et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2000-0591                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/311,291                                                                                 
                     According to the specification, 9-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethylbut-1-yl) guanine,                      
              an acyclic nucleoside also known as penciclovir or PCV, “[has] antiviral activity, and [is]                
              potentially useful in the treatment of infections caused by herpes viruses, such as                        
              herpes simplex type 1 [HSV-1], herpes simplex type 2 [HSV-2] and varicella zoster                          
              viruses [VZV].”  Page 5.                                                                                   
                     Claims 22, 23, 29 through 31, 33, 35, 39 through 41, 47 through 49, 81 through                      
              86 and 104 through 108, directed to pharmaceutical compositions comprising                                 
              penciclovir and to methods of treating HSV-1, HSV-2 and VZV using the compositions,                        
              have been indicated as allowable by the examiner.  Claims 27, 28, 43, 46, 51, 57                           
              through 60, 99 through 103 and 109 through 120, directed to treating herpesvirus                           
              infections generally using the compositions, are the subject of this appeal.                               
                                                     DISCUSSION                                                          
              Enablement                                                                                                 
                     According to the examiner, “the specification, while being enabling for the scope                   
              of claims [directed to treating HSV-1, HSV-2 and VZV infections], does not reasonably                      
              provide enablement for treating herpesviruses generally.”  Final Rejection, paper no.                      
              44.  The examiner maintains that “the historical record has been that translating in vitro                 
              results to in vivo results in the antiviral area does not resemble other areas, such as the                
              antibacterial area” (Answer, page 10), that “[d]espite intensive efforts, pharmaceutical                   
              science has been unable to find a way of getting a compound to be effective for the                        
              treatment of herpesviruses generally” (Id., page 4), and “an antiviral that operates                       
              generally against a virus family is utterly without precedent” (Id., page 12), thus, “it is                


                                                           4                                                             


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007