The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT STEVEN CLOUGH
and MARIO ALBERTO PEREZ
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0595
Application No. 09/025,400
____________
HEARD: June 13, 2002
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 9. The remaining claims
pending in this application are claims 2 and 10 through 20, which
stand withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a non-
elected invention (Brief, page 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007