Ex Parte ST. PIERRE JR. et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2000-0671                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/909,507                                                                                  


                     1.   A system for implementing a boundary scan chain, said system                                    
                     comprising:                                                                                          
                            an interface board comprising:                                                                
                            a connector for transferring boundary scan signals; and                                       
                            a plurality of interfaces coupled in series in a  predetermined order,                        
                            and in parallel to receive a plurality of said boundary scan signals;                         
                            and at least one card comprising:                                                             
                                   a socket for receiving an integrated circuit; and                                      
                                   a connector interface, coupled to said socket, for removably                           
                                   coupling with one of said plurality of interfaces.                                     
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                     
                     Jarwala et al. [Jarwala]            5,331,274                    Jul. 19, 1994                       
                     Chang et al. [Chang]                5,544,309                    Aug. 06, 1996                       
                     Claims 1-3, 9 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  § 102 (b) as anticipated by                     
              Jarwala.                                                                                                    
                     Claims 4-8 and 10-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  §  103.  As evidence of                         
              obviousness, the examiner offers Jarwala with regard to claims 4 and 5, adding Chang                        
              with regard to claims 6-8 and 10-14.                                                                        
                     Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective psoitions of                            
              appellants and the examiner.                                                                                
                                                         OPINION                                                          
                     With regard to the rejection under 35 U.S.C.  § 102 (b), the examiner cites                          
                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007