The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY M. NOBEL, NICHOLAS NICOLOFF JR.,
THOMAS M. SABO and CLAYTON L. HOLSTUN
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-0703
Application No. 08/490,268
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8, 10, 13
through 20 and 24 through 26, all of the pending claims in the
application.
The disclosed invention relates to an inkjet printer with a
printhead wherein means are provided to cause all nozzles and ink
ejection elements in the printhead to be used about the same to
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007