Ex Parte JIMAREZ et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0882                                                        
          Application No. 08/890,582                                                  
               1.   A printed circuit board assembly comprising:                      
               a)   a printed circuit board comprising a dielectric                   
          substrate, a first metallic layer disposed on one opposing face             
          of said substrate, and a second metallic layer disposed on                  
          another opposing face of said substrate;                                    
               b)   a metal back plate having a connection surface; and               
               c)   a bonding layer bonding the second metallic layer of              
          said printed circuit board to the connection surface of said                
          metal back plate; said bonding layer comprising an adhesive                 
          polymer and a conductive metal having an EMF of less than zero              
          volts, said conductive metal being dispersed throughout said                
          polymer; said conductive metal being present at a weight of from            
          about 45% to about 90% by weight of the total bonding layer                 
          weight; said polymer selected from the group consisting of an               
          acrylic polymer, an epoxy-based polymer and a thermoplastic                 
          polymer.                                                                    
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Iliou et al. (Iliou)          4,616,413           Oct. 14, 1986             
          Capote et al. (Capote)        5,538,789           Jul. 23, 1996             
               Claims 1 through 12 and 14 through 22 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Iliou in view of                 
          Capote.                                                                     
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 13,              
          mailed December 22, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning             
          in support of the rejection, and to appellants' Brief (Paper                
          No. 12, filed October 25, 1999) for appellants' arguments                   
          thereagainst.                                                               


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007