Ex Parte VON BORSTEL et al - Page 10


                 Appeal No. 2000-0893                                                                                                         Page  10                   
                 Application No. 08/392,407                                                                           
                 antibodies produced is dependent upon exactly what hapten is used and that is                        
                 not readily predictable.”  Specifically, the examiner finds (id.), Janda teach                       
                 “catalytic antibodies were raised against hapten (1) and … found that substrates                     
                 with the greatest homology to the [sic] hapten (2 and 3) were not hydrolyzed by                      
                 the antibody, whereas substrates that had less homology to the hapten (4-6)                          
                 were hydrolyzed.  Similarly, the examiner finds (Answer, pages 5-6), “[i]n Schultz                   
                 catalytic antibodies made using a mixture of diastereomers of a hapten (I)                           
                 catalyzed the cleavage of the D diastereomer of a homologous substrate (II) but                      
                 not the L diastereomer, even though the hapten used was a mixture of both                            
                 diastereomers.”                                                                                      
                        In view of this evidence, the examiner concludes (Answer, page 6) “that                       
                 due to the unpredictability of the catalytic antibody art and the fact that not one                  
                 example of an operable catalytic antibody is contained in the instant                                
                 specification, the instant claimed invention would require undue                                     
                 experimentation….”  In response appellants find (Reply Brief, pages 8-9) that                        
                 Schultz and Schechter, which is cited by Schultz, demonstrate that:                                  
                        one of ordinary skill in the art would reasonably predict that a                              
                        mixture of enantiomers would necessarily yield a mixture of                                   
                        antibodies which are preferentially specific for the D-isomer.                                
                        Therefore, one would also predict that those catalytic antibodies                             
                        identified would be active against the D-isomer rather than the L-                            
                        isomer.  This is, in fact, what Schultz found.  Given Schechter’s                             
                        observations, one would reasonably predict that an enantiomeric                               
                        mixture of haptens would preferentially produce catalytic antibodies                          
                        that stereospecifically catalyze the conversion of the D-isomer in an                         
                        enantiomeric mixture.                                                                         
                        Similarly, appellants find (Reply Brief, pages 9-10) that “Janda shows how                    
                 one can control the reaction catalyzed by considering the different elements                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007