Ex Parte LANDINGHAM - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2000-0920                                                        
          Application No. 08/829,034                                                  


               commensurate in scope with these claims.  Specifically,                
               elemental calcium, iron, and nickel are clearly                        
               encompassed by the present claims as those materials                   
               with which the molten metal would be made.  However,                   
               calcium metal evolves hydrogen when it contacts                        
               moisture or water and would cause harm to a living                     
               organism if implanted thereinto in a significant                       
               amount.  Similarly, elemental iron would rust in the                   
               body and could lead to necrosis.  Elemental nickel is a                
               know [sic] carcinogen according to OSHA.  For these                    
               reasons, the claims are considered so broad as to                      
               encompass inoperative embodiments.                                     
               The enablement requirement of the first paragraph of Section           
          112 “requires that the scope of the claims must bear a reasonable           
          correlation to the scope of enablement provided by the                      
          specification to persons of ordinary skill in the art.”  In re              
          Fisher, 427 F.2d 833, 839, 166 USPQ 18, 24 (CCPA 1970).  Although           
          the examiner has hypothesized that cermets containing significant           
          amounts of elemental calcium, iron, and nickel as the infiltrated           
          metal would cause harm to a living organism, we think it is                 
          reasonably clear from appellant’s disclosure3 that claims 11-18             
          are directed to bone implants that do not encompass within their            
          scope the utilization of infiltrated metal or metal alloy that              
          would be incompatible with or harmful to the host organism.                 
          Pointing out, as the examiner has done here, that a claim is                


               3See, for example, page 26, line 34, through page 27, line             
          1, of the specification.                                                    
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007