The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID D. OTTEN
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-0972
Application No. 08/679,848
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
and 2. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 14), claims
1 and
2 were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a communication system
for preventing the transmissions of a mobile unit in proximity
to a communications service from interfering with the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007