Ex Parte DETRICK et al - Page 4



         Appeal No. 2000-1386                                                        
         Application No. 09/078,477                                                  

          Id.  In accordance with the invention, “[a]t least one coating             
          component, and preferably two coating components, of the coating           
          composition is injected into the cascading material at the top             
          moving layer.”  Appeal Brief, Paper No. 10, received  February 17,         
          2000, page 3.                                                              

                                      DISCUSSION                                     
               The examiner relies on Huttlin for a teaching of:                     
                   a method of coating a granular material with a                    
              coating material where the granular material is rotated                
              and cascaded in a horizontal rotating drum and a coating               
              material is injected into what is considered a top moving              
              layer of the cascading granular material, with a                       
              plurality of nozzles, where the coating material wets the              
              granular material.                                                     
         Examiner’s Answer, Paper No. 11, mailed March 17, 2000, page 3              
         (citations omitted).  The examiner maintains that Huttlin teaches           
         each of the claim 7 method steps with the exception of collecting           
         or using the coating granules.  See id.  The examiner takes the             
         position that this latter step is well known and conventional in            
         the art1 and, therefore, it would have been obvious for one of              
         ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellants’ invention to           


              1                                                                      
              1Appellants do not dispute this finding.                               
                                          4                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007