Ex parte FRANKLIN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1664                                                        
          Application No. 09/114,790                                                  


                                     The prior art                                    
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner and rejecting the appealed claims is:                              
          McAllister et al. (McAllister)     5,757,079           May 26,              
                                                                 1998                 


                                     The rejection                                    
               Claims 6-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over McAllister.                                               
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above noted                
          rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No.              
          7) and the answer (Paper No. 12) for the examiner’s complete                
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper              
          No. 11) and reply brief (Paper No. 15) for the appellants’                  
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     


                                        Opinion                                       
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                 
          careful consideration to the appellants’ specification and                  
          claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to the                      
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007