Ex Parte SEAL et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-1799                                                        
          Application 09/211,473                                                      

          resin-impregnated fiber material;                                           
               (b) without applying pressure, heating the resin-impregnated           
          fiber material under vacuum at a sufficient temperature for a               
          sufficient amount of time until the resin reaches gel stage; and            
               (c) applying temperature for a sufficient period to cure the           
          resin-impregnated fiber material, wherein:                                  
               (I) the starting percentage by weight of fiber material, is            
          30-80%;                                                                     
               (II) the starting percentage by weight of resin, is 20-70%.            
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Seibold et al. (Seibold)         4,100,322         Jul. 11, 1978            
          Palmer et al. (Palmer)           4,942,013         Jul. 17, 1990            
          Honka                            5,106,568         Apr. 21, 1992            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 2 and 9-11             
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Seibold; claims 8, 12, 13, 58                 
          and 59 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Seibold; claims 3, 7 and 14               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Seibold in view of Honka; claims 4-6             
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Seibold in view of Honka and Palmer;             
          and claims 58 and 59 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as            
          being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and                  
          distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants regard             
          as the invention.1                                                          

               1 Rejections of claims 7, 8, 12-14 and 58 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
                                                                  (continued...)      
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007