Ex parte HOGANSON - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1963                                                        
          Application No. 09/272,989                                                  


          video cameras” (specification, page 1).  Claim 1 reads as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               1.  An anti-glare device for use with objective lenses                 
          mounted in a housing, said device comprising:                               
               an elongated strip of flexible, soft material having a                 
          length between ends to wrap around a housing containing                     
          objective lenses and to overlap on itself, a width to project               
          from said housing and sufficient rigidity to maintain an                    
          encircling formation projecting from said housing;                          
               connector means fixed to one face of one of said ends of               
          said elongate strip of flexible soft material; and                          
               co-operating connector means fixed to at least an                      
          opposite end of said elongate strip of flexible, soft                       
          material, said connector means interlocking when one of said                
          ends overlaps the other of said ends when said elongate strip               
          is wrapped around and projects from an end of said housing.                 

                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of                
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Villarreal               4,089,117                     May  16,             
          1978                                                                        
          Bock                          4,751,950                     June            
          21, 1988                                                                    

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  
          paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and distinctly              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007