Appeal No. 2000-1991
Application No. 08/587,417
these combinations, the rejection of claim 17 is also not
sustained.
In summary, the rejection of claims 1, 5-10, 12-18 and 20-25
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of enablement is
not sustained; the rejection of claims 1, 5-10, 12-18 and 20-25
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is not sustained; the
rejection of claims 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12 and 20-25 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) over Aoyama is not sustained. Neither is the rejection
of claim 8 over Aoyama and Wolf sustained; nor the rejection of
claims 9, 10, 23-25 over Aoyama and Fukunaga is sustained; nor
the rejection of claims 7, 13-16, 18, 20 and 21 over Aoyama,
Fukunaga, Chang and Shan is sustained or over Aoyama, Fukunaga
and Dahm is sustained; nor the rejection of claim 17 over Aoyama,
Fukunaga, Chang, Shan and Wolf; or Aoyama, Fukunaga, Dahm and
Wolf.
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007