The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM DAVID KAPPELE
and
ANNE MARIE PEARSON
____________
Appeal No. 2000-2149
Application No. 08/859,901
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 1, 3, 8 through 10, 20, 29 and 32 through 34. Claims 2, 4
through 6, 17, 25 through 28, 30 and 31 have previously been allowed. Claims 12
through 16 and 21 through 24 previously rejected have been indicated as allowable in the
Answer. See Answer, page 2. Claims 7, 11, 18 and 19 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007