Ex Parte MAEDA - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the              
          Board.                                                                       
                                                             Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
                                Ex parte YUKARI MAEDA                                  
                                      __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-2184                                   
                                Application 08/629,626                                 
                                     ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                       
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LEVY, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                      
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                    
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                       
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-32.  An amendment            
          after final rejection was filed on April 5, 1999 and was entered             
          by the examiner.  This amendment cancelled claims 27-29.                     
          Therefore, this appeal is directed to the rejection of claims                
          1-26 and 30-32.                                                              
          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                             
          apparatus for adjusting the focus of a film.  More particularly,             
                                          1                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007