Ex Parte KISLANKO - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte JAMES P. KISLANKO                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-2220                                  
                               Application 08/962,428                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-17, 19 and            
          20.  Claims 5, 12 and 18 have been indicated to contain allowable           
          subject matter.  An amendment after final rejection was filed on            
          September 13, 1999 and was entered by the examiner.                         
          The disclosed invention pertains to a computer-based                        
          system for inferring an output date expressed in a format having            
          a four-digit calendar year from a historical input date expressed           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007