Ex Parte BAREKET et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 18                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                                 Ex parte NOAH BAREKET,                               
                                  CHRISTIAN G. DESPLAT                                
                                  and LANCE A. GLASSER                                
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2001-0006                               
                              Application 08/993,107                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before THOMAS, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 

               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 1 through 26.  Representative claim 1             
          is reproduced below:                                                        
               1.  A method for identifying a defect in a reticle                     
          containing features that scatter light, which features together             
          define a pattern to be transferred a substrate surface, the                 
          method comprising:                                                          



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007